I have just finished watching Modern Family Season 6 Episode 16 “Connection Lost”, throughout watching this I could not help but view certain scenes from a sociological perspective. This episode was a prime example of sociology in everyday life through the interplay of social characteristics such as gender and age with concepts of capitalism and new technology. It provoked me to flesh out these thoughts within the words below, no knowledge of Modern Family is required to follow my thoughts.
This 20 minute episode saw a side story which revolved around Claire, a mother to three teenagers and wife to a ‘Realtor’ (an American estate agent), and her perspective on a family issue. Although Claire was physically away from her family at an airport in Chicago, the medium of screen casting (digitally recording a computer screen) on her Apple laptop, the whole cast was seen throughout the episode. The plot developed through Facetiming, messaging on Facebook and searching Google. Indeed, this episode creatively shows how ubiquitous digital forms of communication has become, social media is the dominant form of communicating with others. The mere fact that an entire episode uses an Apple laptop to explore a storyline advocates this point. This was a clever idea from the writers, this difference provokes me as a viewer to watch more attentively and relate to the use of sponsored social media use, the only thing missing was the use of emojis.
Indeed, this did provoke a conversation between myself and my partner: we joked how much Apple, Facebook and Google must have paid for the sponsorship or what the writers got in return. There is no doubt about it that this advertisement worked, I bought into Claire’s life, I wanted her laptop, I wanted to use the websites she did, have the applications that she had open, and effortlessly socialise with my family whilst at an airport for who knows what reason. The fact that we do not know why Claire is actually at the airport adds to the craving of this glamorous ‘on the move’ life. Upon reflection, my desire for this does reflect Marx’s concept of commodity fetishism: the idea that physical objects that are bought and sold, such as a laptop, have characteristics that they do not hold outside of societal context. For instance, the Apple laptop for me, as a viewer of this episode, hold the power of effortlessly socialising which instigates my desire for the object. This is the foundation of capitalism, buying a ‘life’ through material possessions to achieve the capitalist desires that are advertised throughout media. Of course, I do not want to discredit Modern Family as a driving force of capitalism. Whilst I was under the mystical powers that this form of commodity fetishism encapsulates, my partner was critical and argued against the use of Apple in comparison to Android. Indeed, one could argue that the avocation of android is no different and this still involves capitalist values in some way but the mere fact that we both reacted in different ways to this promotions shows how this sociological concept should not be definitive.
This episode also struck me with how it related gender and age with technology. As technology was obviously at the forefront of this episode, we saw Jay, the 60 something year old father to Claire struggle with technology. He would often answer face time by putting the phone to his ear or accidentally calling Claire on Facetime when he thought he was taking a video. Such portrayals positioned Jay as the self-proclaimed stereotypical ‘old man out of touch with new technology’. Indeed, it was not only Jay that was the victim of social pressures of being tech savvy, Claire identifies herself as this to avoid a fight with her husband. When Claire hangs up on Phil’s, her husband, Facetime whilst he plays Halo, Phil is upset and askes Claire why. Claire responds “Oh you know me, I don’t get Computers” whilst effortlessly multitasking with shortcuts on her laptop. The juxtaposition of this confession with the fact that the viewer can see the tech skills that Claire is exhibiting on her laptop fuels the comedic value of the show. Through playing up to her gender and position within her family, she is playing societal norms to her advantage. The very fact the writers include this for comedic value shows that not only is this gender norm now being challenged within the media but also the mother is positioned as knowing how to play society so she ‘win’.
Overall, I believe the writers of this episode got it spot on. The intrigue that the episode offered due being different sparks the viewer to watch and buy into Claire’s digital life. Indeed, it provokes me to think, could the writers get away with creating a whole series based around screen casting now that the communication has become so ubiquitous in everyday life and within the modern family?
Reference for Marx's Commodity Fetishism: https://www.marxists.org/archive/pilling/works/capital/ch05.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment