Showing posts with label capital. Show all posts
Showing posts with label capital. Show all posts

Thursday, 12 October 2017

Engaging the disengaged parent within education

Studies within education have consistently found that parental engagement within education positively impacts upon the educational success of young people: this is referred to as “good parenting” (Desforges and Abouchaar, 2003; Goodall, 2016; Goodall, 2017; Goodall and Vorhaus, 2011; Harris and Goodall, 2010). After critically engaging with these studies, it could be inferred that they assume a bias against parents that do not, for whatever reason, value the field of education: it positions this parenting as “bad”. As Bourdieu (1977) attributes parental involvement in education to parents of the middle class, it could be seen that this positioning of “bad parents” replicates some sociological studies which found the distancing and “disgust” of working class individuals (Lawler, 2005).  

Despite whether it is believed that labelling some parents as good or bad should be done, it has been found that the field of education can transform a child’s life (Teach First, 2017). If parental engagement contributes towards the educational success of a child, it is important that this is encouraged for disadvantaged pupils. Therefore, to raise the educational attainment of disengaged and underachieving pupils, educators must firstly engage the disengaged parent. To engage the disengaged parent, schools must strike a balance between encouraging parents to attend training session to support their child’s educational progress and treating them as a colleague: the expert on their child. Literature suggests that this balance should be achieved through engaging parents in a sensitive and personalised manner (Goodall, 2016; Smith, 2016).

There are two strategies, within the literature, that have been proven to engage parents in a sensitive and personalised manner: one that I cannot implement but another which I could adapt. The first one is Save the Children’s FAST programme in which parents and children were brought together for a meal within school (Harris and Goodall, 2010). This non-invasive approach gets the parent into the school to socialise with their child. It could make the parent feel more comfortable within the school environment and encourage them to speak about their child’s studies. Of course, as a classroom teacher, I could not implement this method. However, I found it an interesting social strategy to break down the barriers of parental disengagement. The second strategy comes from Goodall’s (2016) blog post on teachertoolkit.co.uk. This post encourages teachers to shift from reporting to parents at parents’ evening to fostering a partnership to support learning. Treating parents with respect, recognising and acknowledging their efforts to come to the parents evening are encouraged to foster this working relationship (Goodall, 2016). Furthermore, Goodall (2016) suggests giving parents a list of questions to ask teachers to supplement their cultural capital, as some parents may not know how to engage with the teacher. Similarly, Goodall (2016) suggests that teachers should ask the parents how they can facilitate learning for their children. Through treating the parent as the expert, the parent will feel more comfortable and at ease with engaging with teachers (Smith, 2016).

Following this research, I plan to approach parental engagement in a different way than I did last academic year. By moving from reporting to engaging parents to support learning and providing parents with resources they may need to do so. This is especially important within my subject, Computing; often parents will approach me and state that they “know nothing about technology” and that it is their children who are the experts. If parents feel intellectually inferior to their child, how can they possibly help support learning? Therefore, I plan to give a list of resources that may help to these parents and move away from subject specifics at parents evening. As Goodall, in a recent lecture, stated: it does not matter that parents do not know the answer, what matters is they know how to find the answer. I intend to provide parents with the means to find that answer.

References:
Bourdieu (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Desforges and Abouchaar (2003) The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustment: a literature review.
Goodall and Vorhaus (2011) Review of best practice in parental engagement. Department of Education.
Goodall, J (2016) Reporting to Support. Online: https://www.teachertoolkit.co.uk/2016/08/10/parental-support/
Goodall, J (2017) From project to process. a report of the pilot of a toolkit for parental engagement. 
Harris and Goodall (2010) Helping families support children’s success at school. Save the Children.
Lawler (2005) Disgusted subjects: the making of middle-class identities. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 429-446.
Smith (2016) Swing Time. London: Penguin.
Teach First (2017) Income defines how well children do at school. Online: https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/our-mission/the-issue.

Monday, 28 August 2017

Why I would rather live in my "deprived" ex-mining village compared to anywhere else in the world

There are many different definitions of place attachment. Most definitions agree that it refers to an emotional connection between a person and a geographical area. However, where Brown and Raymond (2007) define that geographical area as a person's immediate attachment, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2008) defines this as any place in the world. The way I interpret this definition allows the individual to feel an emotion connection to an area in which they have not necessarily visited. For this reason, any reference to place attachment will invoke this definition. 

Growing up, I was adamant that I would move to London for university and later live in Spain, Italy and America. I was attracted to the places that seemed different and adventurous in comparison to the ex-mining white working-class village in Yorkshire, where I had lived since I was born. When I was reminded of these foreign places, through popular culture or holidays, I felt a strong attachment to the life I could be living in these prosperous areas. In reality, the university I went to was in fact further north than my home village. It is interesting when I reflect upon how I made this geographical decision. Part of my undergraduate dissertation actually researched into how the "feel" of a university influences the decision that a first generation university student, such as myself, makes. Following similar conclusions, the northern university I chose was the correct fit for my habitus. Habitus, defined by Bourdieu (1972), as a set of dispositions that are second nature and familiar to an individual. 

Since I left for university as an undergraduate, besides going home over summer, I have never moved back to my home village. Now, living in Stoke-on-Trent, the home sickness is starting to catch up with me. Perhaps my habitus is being stretched too much by the 180 mile distance with weak train connections, and the feeling of being in Staffordshire rather than Yorkshire. It could be possible that I now feel like a "fish out of water" as Bourdieu (1972) would describe: living a life that is not completely compatible with my habitus. As such, my place attachment is not towards Stoke but rather my home village back in Yorkshire.

Indeed, when I visit my parent's house I do get the feeling that I will move back into my teenage bedroom at some ambiguous point in the future. Anton and Lawrence's (2014) research found that their participants had a higher attachment to their homes rather than local areas. Perhaps what I feel is not place attachment but a sense of nostalgia for a time gone by where I dreamt of where I would be living as an adult.

It is interesting to think that, although I have the economic means and knowledge that I could live anywhere I wanted, I have decided to go back to the same "deprived" village in which I grew up. Why would I want to live in this ex-mining town when I could live by the sea in Spain, a historic Italian town or a bustling city in America? Research from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2008) suggests this, indeed, does have to do with habitus and capital. Their report on place attachment in areas of deprivation found strong social networks and historical links to the area create this bond. 

Bourdieu's theory of practice relates to place attachment as habitus fosters the emotional connection with a geographical location. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation's (2008) research found that place attachment is higher in more homogenous areas in which residents have common backgrounds, interests and culture. My ex-mining town is a white working class area with a uniquely Yorkshire accent, so this could be why it fits my habitus.

The idea of moving back does make me feel optimistic for the future of the village. Migrating for educational qualifications and skills across the country fills me with the sense of "giving back". Indeed, high attachment to place results in positive outcomes, for example, becoming socially and politically involved to create a better community for all (Anton and Lawrence, 2014). Of course, I could also be completely wrong, move back, hate it and move to New York City; but we will have to wait and see, I am sure that would make for an interesting reflective blog post if it were to happen!


References:
G. Brown, C. Raymond (2007) The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Towards mapping place attachment. Applied Geography, 27, pp. 89-111
C.E. Anton and C. Lawrence (2014) Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, pp. 451-461
Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2008) People's attachment to place - the influence of neighbourhood deprivation. Available at: https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/2200-neighbourhoods-attachment-deprivation.pdf

P. Bourdieu (1972) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: University Press